BCS: Stands for Bullshit Corporate System
*For thoughts on this year's (2006-07) BCS scandal, read my post, BCS Mess: Three Arguments Keeping the Bullshit Corporate System in Place*
Did anyone else notice that there weren't any college football bowl games on New Year's Day this year? Was anyone else annoyed by this?
Did anyone else feel betrayed? Confused by the sudden way in which an annual tradition had been removed and annihilated? A sacred ritual has been sabotaged and I have not heard a single cry of blasphemy. Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe there are not others like myself, who were thrown out of sync, our cycles disrupted -- unable to find a sure footing to stand on during those dawning hours of 2006. After all, what were we supposed to do, watch the NFL? (My suspicion, by the way, is that since New Year's fell on a Sunday, the college football games were rearranged: 1) to avoid television contract disputes and conflicts with the network scheduling of those NFL games, and 2) to prolong, even further, the length of the college bowl season, which used to take place on a single day and now stretches on for nearly two weeks. Which is to say: $$$$$$$$!)
To make things clear, there were several bowl games played on Monday, the day after New Year's. There were also several bowl games played in the week leading up to New Year's, and there have been several games played since Monday, the day-after New Year's. Indeed, there have been an excess of bowl games. Pointless, poorly officiated, not very well-executed bowl games. Did anyone see the MasterCard Alamo Bowl (Michigan vs. Nebraska) or the Outback Steakhouse Bowl (Florida vs. Iowa), both of which were ruined by bad calls and non-calls by the officials? Did anyone really expect #5 Oregon, which had been shafted by the BCS in favor of lower-ranked Notre Dame (which brings in a much larger TV audience), to show up excited to play #23 Oklahoma in the Pacific Life Holiday Bowl on December 29, a Thursday night? Is it any wonder that the only non-BCS match-up that seemed genuinely interesting -- LSU vs. Miami in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl -- was a complete blowout? What a waste...
Now that the BCS has -- for the first time, in its eighth year -- finally arrived at the dream match-up (that it has been promising all along) between an unambiguous #1 and an unambiguous #2, all the other bowl games have been rendered superfluous. Great match-up between Notre Dame and Ohio State in that Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, eh? So what. Joe Paterno and Bobby Bowden, tête-à-tête in the Fed-Ex Orange Bowl! Big deal. With USC and Texas in the Rose Bowl Game Presented by Citi, we have at last arrived at the Perfect Bowl Game, a contest of titans that leaves all other college football games in the dark of its long, mighty shadow. Even if the game does live up to its billing (and I've been predicting a rout for months), that would simply make the other bowl games -- including the other BCS bowls -- seem even more meaningless.
I've always been of the mind that we either need to stick with the old bowl system, with its traditional conference match-ups, or go all the way to a real tournament setting -- which means at least eight teams. This in-between stuff is stupid. College football was more fun when there was an end-of-season controversy anyway. Now that things are all set to be settled, fair and square, ESPN has become so desperate for something to hypothesize about, it has been running an idiotic poll to determine whether USC is really the greatest football team of all time and how does USC compare to the other great teams of the past ten or so years (all the other contenders for 'greatest of all time,' apparently, are teams from recent memory -- Nebraska '95, Miami '01, and so forth). Woody Hayes and Bear Bryant, I'm sure, are rolling in their graves.
Did anyone else notice that there weren't any college football bowl games on New Year's Day this year? Was anyone else annoyed by this?
Did anyone else feel betrayed? Confused by the sudden way in which an annual tradition had been removed and annihilated? A sacred ritual has been sabotaged and I have not heard a single cry of blasphemy. Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe there are not others like myself, who were thrown out of sync, our cycles disrupted -- unable to find a sure footing to stand on during those dawning hours of 2006. After all, what were we supposed to do, watch the NFL? (My suspicion, by the way, is that since New Year's fell on a Sunday, the college football games were rearranged: 1) to avoid television contract disputes and conflicts with the network scheduling of those NFL games, and 2) to prolong, even further, the length of the college bowl season, which used to take place on a single day and now stretches on for nearly two weeks. Which is to say: $$$$$$$$!)
To make things clear, there were several bowl games played on Monday, the day after New Year's. There were also several bowl games played in the week leading up to New Year's, and there have been several games played since Monday, the day-after New Year's. Indeed, there have been an excess of bowl games. Pointless, poorly officiated, not very well-executed bowl games. Did anyone see the MasterCard Alamo Bowl (Michigan vs. Nebraska) or the Outback Steakhouse Bowl (Florida vs. Iowa), both of which were ruined by bad calls and non-calls by the officials? Did anyone really expect #5 Oregon, which had been shafted by the BCS in favor of lower-ranked Notre Dame (which brings in a much larger TV audience), to show up excited to play #23 Oklahoma in the Pacific Life Holiday Bowl on December 29, a Thursday night? Is it any wonder that the only non-BCS match-up that seemed genuinely interesting -- LSU vs. Miami in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl -- was a complete blowout? What a waste...
Now that the BCS has -- for the first time, in its eighth year -- finally arrived at the dream match-up (that it has been promising all along) between an unambiguous #1 and an unambiguous #2, all the other bowl games have been rendered superfluous. Great match-up between Notre Dame and Ohio State in that Tostitos Fiesta Bowl, eh? So what. Joe Paterno and Bobby Bowden, tête-à-tête in the Fed-Ex Orange Bowl! Big deal. With USC and Texas in the Rose Bowl Game Presented by Citi, we have at last arrived at the Perfect Bowl Game, a contest of titans that leaves all other college football games in the dark of its long, mighty shadow. Even if the game does live up to its billing (and I've been predicting a rout for months), that would simply make the other bowl games -- including the other BCS bowls -- seem even more meaningless.
I've always been of the mind that we either need to stick with the old bowl system, with its traditional conference match-ups, or go all the way to a real tournament setting -- which means at least eight teams. This in-between stuff is stupid. College football was more fun when there was an end-of-season controversy anyway. Now that things are all set to be settled, fair and square, ESPN has become so desperate for something to hypothesize about, it has been running an idiotic poll to determine whether USC is really the greatest football team of all time and how does USC compare to the other great teams of the past ten or so years (all the other contenders for 'greatest of all time,' apparently, are teams from recent memory -- Nebraska '95, Miami '01, and so forth). Woody Hayes and Bear Bryant, I'm sure, are rolling in their graves.
6 Comments:
FYI: Whenever Jan. 1 is a Sunday, bowl games have traditionally been moved to Monday to accommodate the NFL.
Nor: I thought that might be the case, but couldn't remember. My point, though, is that the BCS has disrupted the Jan. 1 rite by stringing the bowls over the course of a week. It's trying to simulate the success of the March basketball tourney, but when so many of the lesser bowls and even some of the BCS bowls have little to no significance (and have lost the appeal of the traditional conference-on-conference rivalries), that doesn't work. It makes more money and forces us to sit through more ads, but does not make for more excitement. I preferred having one day of concentrated college football, flipping through channels, trying to catch as many of the best moments as I could, than this new feeling, like I need to clear a week's schedule for a bunch of games that often seem too long and pointless. If they're going to fuck with the system, they need to go whole hog and implement a real playoff.
To draw out the "bowl game season" even longer, the BCS (which, with the exception of the Rose Bowl, will be viewed on FOX next season)is adding another game: the BCS championship. Now there will be two games on the first of '07, one more on the second, another on the third, then the N'tl Championship game on the EIGHTH! This year, both texas and usc had to wait almsot 5 weeks to play their last game. Teams like the big ten end their seasons one or two weeks before conferences like the big 12 and the pac 10. That means that if a big ten team goes to the championship that they will have to wait over 6 weeks to play their final game, an ENTIRE WEEK after the first of january. that's just ridiculous; we NEED a playoff.
don't hold your breath, wes ... "New BCS coordinator open to changes, but not playoff": http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2280592
I was wondering if anyone remembers or knows that USC lost to two UNRANKED teams, yet able to be in a bcs game? If that doesn't prove COASTAL BIAS.....well....I forgotten the meaning.
First of all of course it's bullshit; the bcs is run the the corporation. Second college football is bullshit cause it's all about how much money u kick up to the corps. Third, it's completely fake. Seriously u have to be a fool to believe any of it is actually real competition. Fourth, college football is for morons. A bunch of kids on steroids in tights running around trying to hurt one another, think about. And lastly, college football is so boring. Why do you think so many people bet on it to make is more interesting? And if you don't have any money on the the line? Get a life loser.
Post a Comment
<< Home